IVV vs MTUM: which ETF won each year?
Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.
IVVtracks the S&P 500 Index
MTUMtracks the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index
IVV tracks the S&P 500 IndexMTUM tracks the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index
What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?
You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.
IVV vs MTUM, year by year
Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.
| Year | IVV | MTUM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 (so far) | +9.92% | +37.24% | MTUM |
| 2025 | +17.85% | +22.15% | MTUM |
| 2024 | +24.93% | +32.89% | MTUM |
| 2023 | +26.31% | +9.15% | IVV |
| 2022 | -18.16% | -18.27% | IVV |
| 2021 | +28.76% | +13.36% | IVV |
| 2020 | +18.40% | +29.86% | MTUM |
| 2019 | +31.25% | +27.25% | IVV |
| 2018 | -4.49% | -1.67% | MTUM |
| 2017 | +21.75% | +37.50% | MTUM |
| 2016 | +11.54% | +5.00% | IVV |
| 2015 | +1.28% | +8.91% | MTUM |
| 2014 | +13.57% | +14.62% | MTUM |
| 2013 | +32.31% | +19.21% | IVV |
| 2012 | +16.06% | — | — |
| 2011 | +1.88% | — | — |
| 2010 | +15.10% | — | — |
| 2009 | +26.61% | — | — |
| 2008 | -37.01% | — | — |
| 2007 | +5.29% | — | — |
| 2006 | +15.94% | — | — |
| 2005 | +4.87% | — | — |
| 2004 | +10.79% | — | — |
| 2003 | +28.46% | — | — |
| 2002 | -21.53% | — | — |
| 2001 | -11.96% | — | — |
| 2000 | -6.08% | — | — |
IVV vs MTUM in plain words
IVV tracks the S&P 500 Index while MTUM follows the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. IVV charges 0.03% a year in running costs and MTUM charges 0.15% — IVV is the cheaper fund to hold.
Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 14 calendar years both funds were trading, IVV finished the year ahead 6 times and MTUM 8 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $39,497 in IVV versus $38,506 in MTUM by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.
Fund facts: IVV vs MTUM
| Fact | IVV | MTUM |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF |
| Tracks | S&P 500 Index | MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index |
| Yearly cost (TER) | 0.03% | 0.15% |
| Dividends | Distributing — dividends paid out | Distributing — dividends paid out |
| Launched | 15 May 2000 | 16 Apr 2013 |
Frequently asked
Is IVV or MTUM better?
Across the 14 calendar years both funds were trading, IVV finished the year ahead 6 times and MTUM 8 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $39,497 in IVV versus $38,506 in MTUM by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.
What is the difference between IVV and MTUM?
IVV tracks the S&P 500 Index while MTUM follows the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. IVV charges 0.03% a year in running costs and MTUM charges 0.15% — IVV is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.
What would $10,000 in IVV have become?
$10,000 invested in IVV at the start of 2016 grew to $39,497 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 14.7% per year.