IVV vs MTUM: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

IVV tracks the S&P 500 IndexMTUM tracks the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index

What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?

You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.

IVV turned it into
$39,497
+14.72% per year on average · 20162025
MTUM turned it into
$38,506
+14.43% per year on average · 20162025
Difference
+$991
IVV made more of the same money

IVV vs MTUM, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
14
where both funds were trading
IVV won
6
years
MTUM won
8
years
YearIVVMTUMWinner
2026 (so far)+9.92%+37.24%MTUM
2025+17.85%+22.15%MTUM
2024+24.93%+32.89%MTUM
2023+26.31%+9.15%IVV
2022-18.16%-18.27%IVV
2021+28.76%+13.36%IVV
2020+18.40%+29.86%MTUM
2019+31.25%+27.25%IVV
2018-4.49%-1.67%MTUM
2017+21.75%+37.50%MTUM
2016+11.54%+5.00%IVV
2015+1.28%+8.91%MTUM
2014+13.57%+14.62%MTUM
2013+32.31%+19.21%IVV
2012+16.06%
2011+1.88%
2010+15.10%
2009+26.61%
2008-37.01%
2007+5.29%
2006+15.94%
2005+4.87%
2004+10.79%
2003+28.46%
2002-21.53%
2001-11.96%
2000-6.08%

IVV vs MTUM in plain words

IVV tracks the S&P 500 Index while MTUM follows the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. IVV charges 0.03% a year in running costs and MTUM charges 0.15% — IVV is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 14 calendar years both funds were trading, IVV finished the year ahead 6 times and MTUM 8 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $39,497 in IVV versus $38,506 in MTUM by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

Fund facts: IVV vs MTUM

FactIVVMTUM
FundiShares Core S&P 500 ETFiShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
TracksS&P 500 IndexMSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.03%0.15%
DividendsDistributing — dividends paid outDistributing — dividends paid out
Launched15 May 200016 Apr 2013

Frequently asked

Is IVV or MTUM better?

Across the 14 calendar years both funds were trading, IVV finished the year ahead 6 times and MTUM 8 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $39,497 in IVV versus $38,506 in MTUM by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between IVV and MTUM?

IVV tracks the S&P 500 Index while MTUM follows the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. IVV charges 0.03% a year in running costs and MTUM charges 0.15% — IVV is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.

What would $10,000 in IVV have become?

$10,000 invested in IVV at the start of 2016 grew to $39,497 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 14.7% per year.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring IVV or MTUM.