VGT vs MTUM: which ETF won each year?
Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.
VGTtracks the MSCI US IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index
MTUMtracks the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index
VGT tracks the MSCI US IMI Information Technology 25/50 IndexMTUM tracks the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index
What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?
You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.
VGT vs MTUM, year by year
Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.
| Year | VGT | MTUM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 (so far) | +27.13% | +37.24% | MTUM |
| 2025 | +21.77% | +22.15% | MTUM |
| 2024 | +29.30% | +32.89% | MTUM |
| 2023 | +52.66% | +9.15% | VGT |
| 2022 | -29.70% | -18.27% | MTUM |
| 2021 | +30.45% | +13.36% | VGT |
| 2020 | +46.04% | +29.86% | VGT |
| 2019 | +48.62% | +27.25% | VGT |
| 2018 | +2.46% | -1.67% | VGT |
| 2017 | +37.08% | +37.50% | MTUM |
| 2016 | +13.77% | +5.00% | VGT |
| 2015 | +5.05% | +8.91% | MTUM |
| 2014 | +16.69% | +14.62% | VGT |
| 2013 | +30.97% | +19.21% | VGT |
| 2012 | +13.96% | — | — |
| 2011 | +0.54% | — | — |
| 2010 | +12.78% | — | — |
| 2009 | +61.89% | — | — |
| 2008 | -42.82% | — | — |
| 2007 | +14.78% | — | — |
| 2006 | +8.85% | — | — |
| 2005 | +3.00% | — | — |
| 2004 | -2.86% | — | — |
VGT vs MTUM in plain words
VGT tracks the MSCI US IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index while MTUM follows the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VGT charges 0.09% a year in running costs and MTUM charges 0.15% — VGT is the cheaper fund to hold.
Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 14 calendar years both funds were trading, VGT finished the year ahead 8 times and MTUM 6 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $76,464 in VGT versus $38,506 in MTUM by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.
Fund facts: VGT vs MTUM
| Fact | VGT | MTUM |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | Vanguard Information Technology ETF | iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF |
| Tracks | MSCI US IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index | MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index |
| Yearly cost (TER) | 0.09% | 0.15% |
| Dividends | Distributing — dividends paid out | Distributing — dividends paid out |
| Launched | 26 Jan 2004 | 16 Apr 2013 |
Frequently asked
Is VGT or MTUM better?
Across the 14 calendar years both funds were trading, VGT finished the year ahead 8 times and MTUM 6 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $76,464 in VGT versus $38,506 in MTUM by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.
What is the difference between VGT and MTUM?
VGT tracks the MSCI US IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index while MTUM follows the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VGT charges 0.09% a year in running costs and MTUM charges 0.15% — VGT is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.
What would $10,000 in VGT have become?
$10,000 invested in VGT at the start of 2016 grew to $76,464 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 22.6% per year.