MTUM vs SPHQ: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

MTUM tracks the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant IndexSPHQ tracks the S&P 500 Quality Index

What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?

You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.

MTUM turned it into
$38,506
+14.43% per year on average · 20162025
SPHQ turned it into
$37,666
+14.18% per year on average · 20162025
Difference
+$840
MTUM made more of the same money

MTUM vs SPHQ, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
14
where both funds were trading
MTUM won
7
years
SPHQ won
7
years
YearMTUMSPHQWinner
2026 (so far)+37.24%+20.79%MTUM
2025+22.15%+13.25%MTUM
2024+32.89%+25.44%MTUM
2023+9.15%+24.83%SPHQ
2022-18.27%-15.76%SPHQ
2021+13.36%+27.59%SPHQ
2020+29.86%+16.93%MTUM
2019+27.25%+33.63%SPHQ
2018-1.67%-7.09%MTUM
2017+37.50%+19.10%MTUM
2016+5.00%+14.30%SPHQ
2015+8.91%+1.64%MTUM
2014+14.62%+16.08%SPHQ
2013+19.21%+32.73%SPHQ
2012+14.32%
2011+6.28%
2010+20.50%
2009+12.59%
2008-46.35%
2007+16.77%
2006+4.58%
2005-2.05%

MTUM vs SPHQ in plain words

MTUM tracks the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index while SPHQ follows the S&P 500 Quality Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. Both funds charge 0.15% a year in running costs.

Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 14 calendar years both funds were trading, MTUM finished the year ahead 7 times and SPHQ 7 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $38,506 in MTUM versus $37,666 in SPHQ by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

Fund facts: MTUM vs SPHQ

FactMTUMSPHQ
FundiShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETFInvesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
TracksMSCI USA Momentum SR Variant IndexS&P 500 Quality Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.15%0.15%
DividendsDistributing — dividends paid outDistributing — dividends paid out
Launched16 Apr 20136 Dec 2005

Frequently asked

Is MTUM or SPHQ better?

Across the 14 calendar years both funds were trading, MTUM finished the year ahead 7 times and SPHQ 7 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $38,506 in MTUM versus $37,666 in SPHQ by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between MTUM and SPHQ?

MTUM tracks the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index while SPHQ follows the S&P 500 Quality Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. Both funds charge 0.15% a year in running costs. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.

What would $10,000 in MTUM have become?

$10,000 invested in MTUM at the start of 2016 grew to $38,506 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 14.4% per year.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring MTUM or SPHQ.