SCHG vs MTUM: which ETF won each year?
Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.
SCHGtracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index
MTUMtracks the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index
SCHG tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market IndexMTUM tracks the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index
What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?
You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.
SCHG vs MTUM, year by year
Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.
| Year | SCHG | MTUM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 (so far) | +3.97% | +37.24% | MTUM |
| 2025 | +17.50% | +22.15% | MTUM |
| 2024 | +34.96% | +32.89% | SCHG |
| 2023 | +50.11% | +9.15% | SCHG |
| 2022 | -31.80% | -18.27% | MTUM |
| 2021 | +28.12% | +13.36% | SCHG |
| 2020 | +39.14% | +29.86% | SCHG |
| 2019 | +36.02% | +27.25% | SCHG |
| 2018 | -1.36% | -1.67% | SCHG |
| 2017 | +28.05% | +37.50% | MTUM |
| 2016 | +6.55% | +5.00% | SCHG |
| 2015 | +3.24% | +8.91% | MTUM |
| 2014 | +15.80% | +14.62% | SCHG |
| 2013 | +34.04% | +19.21% | SCHG |
| 2012 | +16.89% | — | — |
| 2011 | -0.74% | — | — |
| 2010 | +14.92% | — | — |
SCHG vs MTUM in plain words
SCHG tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index while MTUM follows the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. SCHG charges 0.04% a year in running costs and MTUM charges 0.15% — SCHG is the cheaper fund to hold.
Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 14 calendar years both funds were trading, SCHG finished the year ahead 9 times and MTUM 5 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $52,975 in SCHG versus $38,506 in MTUM by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.
Fund facts: SCHG vs MTUM
| Fact | SCHG | MTUM |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF |
| Tracks | Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index | MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index |
| Yearly cost (TER) | 0.04% | 0.15% |
| Dividends | Distributing — dividends paid out | Distributing — dividends paid out |
| Launched | 11 Dec 2009 | 16 Apr 2013 |
Frequently asked
Is SCHG or MTUM better?
Across the 14 calendar years both funds were trading, SCHG finished the year ahead 9 times and MTUM 5 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $52,975 in SCHG versus $38,506 in MTUM by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.
What is the difference between SCHG and MTUM?
SCHG tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index while MTUM follows the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. SCHG charges 0.04% a year in running costs and MTUM charges 0.15% — SCHG is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.
What would $10,000 in SCHG have become?
$10,000 invested in SCHG at the start of 2016 grew to $52,975 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 18.1% per year.
Related comparisons
More head-to-heads featuring SCHG or MTUM.