SCHG vs VGT: which ETF won each year?
Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.
SCHGtracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index
VGTtracks the MSCI US IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index
SCHG tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market IndexVGT tracks the MSCI US IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index
What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?
You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.
SCHG vs VGT, year by year
Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.
| Year | SCHG | VGT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 (so far) | +3.97% | +27.13% | VGT |
| 2025 | +17.50% | +21.77% | VGT |
| 2024 | +34.96% | +29.30% | SCHG |
| 2023 | +50.11% | +52.66% | VGT |
| 2022 | -31.80% | -29.70% | VGT |
| 2021 | +28.12% | +30.45% | VGT |
| 2020 | +39.14% | +46.04% | VGT |
| 2019 | +36.02% | +48.62% | VGT |
| 2018 | -1.36% | +2.46% | VGT |
| 2017 | +28.05% | +37.08% | VGT |
| 2016 | +6.55% | +13.77% | VGT |
| 2015 | +3.24% | +5.05% | VGT |
| 2014 | +15.80% | +16.69% | VGT |
| 2013 | +34.04% | +30.97% | SCHG |
| 2012 | +16.89% | +13.96% | SCHG |
| 2011 | -0.74% | +0.54% | VGT |
| 2010 | +14.92% | +12.78% | SCHG |
| 2009 | — | +61.89% | — |
| 2008 | — | -42.82% | — |
| 2007 | — | +14.78% | — |
| 2006 | — | +8.85% | — |
| 2005 | — | +3.00% | — |
| 2004 | — | -2.86% | — |
SCHG vs VGT in plain words
SCHG tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index while VGT follows the MSCI US IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. SCHG charges 0.04% a year in running costs and VGT charges 0.09% — SCHG is the cheaper fund to hold.
Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 17 calendar years both funds were trading, SCHG finished the year ahead 4 times and VGT 13 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $52,975 in SCHG versus $76,464 in VGT by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.
Fund facts: SCHG vs VGT
| Fact | SCHG | VGT |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | Vanguard Information Technology ETF |
| Tracks | Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index | MSCI US IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index |
| Yearly cost (TER) | 0.04% | 0.09% |
| Dividends | Distributing — dividends paid out | Distributing — dividends paid out |
| Launched | 11 Dec 2009 | 26 Jan 2004 |
Frequently asked
Is SCHG or VGT better?
Across the 17 calendar years both funds were trading, SCHG finished the year ahead 4 times and VGT 13 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $52,975 in SCHG versus $76,464 in VGT by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.
What is the difference between SCHG and VGT?
SCHG tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index while VGT follows the MSCI US IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. SCHG charges 0.04% a year in running costs and VGT charges 0.09% — SCHG is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.
What would $10,000 in SCHG have become?
$10,000 invested in SCHG at the start of 2016 grew to $52,975 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 18.1% per year.
Related comparisons
More head-to-heads featuring SCHG or VGT.