VT vs MTUM: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

VT tracks the FTSE Global All Cap IndexMTUM tracks the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index

What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?

You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.

VT turned it into
$30,414
+11.77% per year on average · 20162025
MTUM turned it into
$38,506
+14.43% per year on average · 20162025
Difference
−$8,092
MTUM made more of the same money

VT vs MTUM, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
14
where both funds were trading
VT won
6
years
MTUM won
8
years
YearVTMTUMWinner
2026 (so far)+11.93%+37.24%MTUM
2025+22.43%+22.15%VT
2024+16.49%+32.89%MTUM
2023+22.02%+9.15%VT
2022-18.00%-18.27%VT
2021+18.27%+13.36%VT
2020+16.59%+29.86%MTUM
2019+26.81%+27.25%MTUM
2018-9.76%-1.67%MTUM
2017+24.50%+37.50%MTUM
2016+8.50%+5.00%VT
2015-1.86%+8.91%MTUM
2014+3.68%+14.62%MTUM
2013+22.94%+19.21%VT
2012+17.12%
2011-7.51%
2010+13.08%
2009+32.66%
2008-33.05%

VT vs MTUM in plain words

VT tracks the FTSE Global All Cap Index while MTUM follows the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VT charges 0.06% a year in running costs and MTUM charges 0.15% — VT is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 14 calendar years both funds were trading, VT finished the year ahead 6 times and MTUM 8 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $30,414 in VT versus $38,506 in MTUM by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

Fund facts: VT vs MTUM

FactVTMTUM
FundVanguard Total World Stock ETFiShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
TracksFTSE Global All Cap IndexMSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.06%0.15%
DividendsDistributing — dividends paid outDistributing — dividends paid out
Launched24 Jun 200816 Apr 2013

Frequently asked

Is VT or MTUM better?

Across the 14 calendar years both funds were trading, VT finished the year ahead 6 times and MTUM 8 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $30,414 in VT versus $38,506 in MTUM by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between VT and MTUM?

VT tracks the FTSE Global All Cap Index while MTUM follows the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VT charges 0.06% a year in running costs and MTUM charges 0.15% — VT is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.

What would $10,000 in VT have become?

$10,000 invested in VT at the start of 2016 grew to $30,414 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 11.8% per year.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring VT or MTUM.