VT vs VTV: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

VT tracks the FTSE Global All Cap IndexVTV tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index

What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?

You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.

VT turned it into
$30,414
+11.77% per year on average · 20162025
VTV turned it into
$30,183
+11.68% per year on average · 20162025
Difference
+$232
VT made more of the same money

VT vs VTV, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
19
where both funds were trading
VT won
9
years
VTV won
10
years
YearVTVTVWinner
2026 (so far)+11.93%+15.30%VTV
2025+22.43%+15.27%VT
2024+16.49%+15.95%VT
2023+22.02%+9.32%VT
2022-18.00%-2.09%VTV
2021+18.27%+26.53%VTV
2020+16.59%+2.33%VT
2019+26.81%+25.66%VT
2018-9.76%-5.47%VTV
2017+24.50%+17.14%VT
2016+8.50%+17.10%VTV
2015-1.86%-0.98%VTV
2014+3.68%+13.17%VTV
2013+22.94%+33.09%VTV
2012+17.12%+15.18%VT
2011-7.51%+1.11%VTV
2010+13.08%+14.54%VTV
2009+32.66%+19.88%VT
2008-33.05%-35.89%VT
2007-0.12%
2006+22.38%
2005+7.21%
2004+13.85%

VT vs VTV in plain words

VT tracks the FTSE Global All Cap Index while VTV follows the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VT charges 0.06% a year in running costs and VTV charges 0.03% — VTV is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 19 calendar years both funds were trading, VT finished the year ahead 9 times and VTV 10 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $30,414 in VT versus $30,183 in VTV by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

Fund facts: VT vs VTV

FactVTVTV
FundVanguard Total World Stock ETFVanguard Value ETF
TracksFTSE Global All Cap IndexCRSP US Large Cap Value Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.06%0.03%
DividendsDistributing — dividends paid outDistributing — dividends paid out
Launched24 Jun 200826 Jan 2004

Frequently asked

Is VT or VTV better?

Across the 19 calendar years both funds were trading, VT finished the year ahead 9 times and VTV 10 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $30,414 in VT versus $30,183 in VTV by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between VT and VTV?

VT tracks the FTSE Global All Cap Index while VTV follows the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VT charges 0.06% a year in running costs and VTV charges 0.03% — VTV is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.

What would $10,000 in VT have become?

$10,000 invested in VT at the start of 2016 grew to $30,414 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 11.8% per year.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring VT or VTV.