QQQM vs VTV: which ETF won each year?
Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.
QQQMtracks the Nasdaq-100 Index
VTVtracks the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index
QQQM tracks the Nasdaq-100 IndexVTV tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index
What did the last 5 years do to $10,000?
You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted. Both funds are measured over the same 5 full years (2021–2025) — the longest stretch both were trading.
QQQM vs VTV, year by year
Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.
| Year | QQQM | VTV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 (so far) | +20.09% | +15.30% | QQQM |
| 2025 | +20.85% | +15.27% | QQQM |
| 2024 | +25.68% | +15.95% | QQQM |
| 2023 | +55.01% | +9.32% | QQQM |
| 2022 | -32.52% | -2.09% | VTV |
| 2021 | +27.45% | +26.53% | QQQM |
| 2020 | +6.67% | +2.33% | QQQM |
| 2019 | — | +25.66% | — |
| 2018 | — | -5.47% | — |
| 2017 | — | +17.14% | — |
| 2016 | — | +17.10% | — |
| 2015 | — | -0.98% | — |
| 2014 | — | +13.17% | — |
| 2013 | — | +33.09% | — |
| 2012 | — | +15.18% | — |
| 2011 | — | +1.11% | — |
| 2010 | — | +14.54% | — |
| 2009 | — | +19.88% | — |
| 2008 | — | -35.89% | — |
| 2007 | — | -0.12% | — |
| 2006 | — | +22.38% | — |
| 2005 | — | +7.21% | — |
| 2004 | — | +13.85% | — |
QQQM vs VTV in plain words
QQQM tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index while VTV follows the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. QQQM charges 0.15% a year in running costs and VTV charges 0.03% — VTV is the cheaper fund to hold.
Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 7 calendar years both funds were trading, QQQM finished the year ahead 6 times and VTV 1 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2021 was worth $20,250 in QQQM versus $18,102 in VTV by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.
Fund facts: QQQM vs VTV
| Fact | QQQM | VTV |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | Vanguard Value ETF |
| Tracks | Nasdaq-100 Index | CRSP US Large Cap Value Index |
| Yearly cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.03% |
| Dividends | Distributing — dividends paid out | Distributing — dividends paid out |
| Launched | 13 Oct 2020 | 26 Jan 2004 |
Frequently asked
Is QQQM or VTV better?
Across the 7 calendar years both funds were trading, QQQM finished the year ahead 6 times and VTV 1 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2021 was worth $20,250 in QQQM versus $18,102 in VTV by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.
What is the difference between QQQM and VTV?
QQQM tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index while VTV follows the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. QQQM charges 0.15% a year in running costs and VTV charges 0.03% — VTV is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.
What would $10,000 in QQQM have become?
$10,000 invested in QQQM at the start of 2021 grew to $20,250 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 15.2% per year.
Related comparisons
More head-to-heads featuring QQQM or VTV.