QQQM vs URTH: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

QQQM tracks the Nasdaq-100 IndexURTH tracks the MSCI World Index

What did the last 5 years do to $10,000?

You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted. Both funds are measured over the same 5 full years (2021–2025) — the longest stretch both were trading.

QQQM turned it into
$20,250
+15.16% per year on average · 20212025
URTH turned it into
$17,903
+12.35% per year on average · 20212025
Difference
+$2,346
QQQM made more of the same money

QQQM vs URTH, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
7
where both funds were trading
QQQM won
4
years
URTH won
3
years
YearQQQMURTHWinner
2026 (so far)+20.09%+9.81%QQQM
2025+20.85%+21.36%URTH
2024+25.68%+18.66%QQQM
2023+55.01%+23.95%QQQM
2022-32.52%-17.97%URTH
2021+27.45%+22.27%QQQM
2020+6.67%+15.78%URTH
2019+28.15%
2018-8.56%
2017+22.95%
2016+7.31%
2015-0.64%
2014+4.37%
2013+26.66%
2012+14.71%

QQQM vs URTH in plain words

QQQM tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index while URTH follows the MSCI World Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. QQQM charges 0.15% a year in running costs and URTH charges 0.24% — QQQM is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 7 calendar years both funds were trading, QQQM finished the year ahead 4 times and URTH 3 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2021 was worth $20,250 in QQQM versus $17,903 in URTH by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

Fund facts: QQQM vs URTH

FactQQQMURTH
FundInvesco NASDAQ 100 ETFiShares MSCI World ETF
TracksNasdaq-100 IndexMSCI World Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.15%0.24%
DividendsDistributing — dividends paid outDistributing — dividends paid out
Launched13 Oct 202010 Jan 2012

Frequently asked

Is QQQM or URTH better?

Across the 7 calendar years both funds were trading, QQQM finished the year ahead 4 times and URTH 3 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2021 was worth $20,250 in QQQM versus $17,903 in URTH by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between QQQM and URTH?

QQQM tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index while URTH follows the MSCI World Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. QQQM charges 0.15% a year in running costs and URTH charges 0.24% — QQQM is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.

What would $10,000 in QQQM have become?

$10,000 invested in QQQM at the start of 2021 grew to $20,250 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 15.2% per year.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring QQQM or URTH.