QQQ vs URTH: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

QQQ tracks the Nasdaq-100 IndexURTH tracks the MSCI World Index

What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?

You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.

QQQ turned it into
$59,045
+19.43% per year on average · 20162025
URTH turned it into
$32,044
+12.35% per year on average · 20162025
Difference
+$27,001
QQQ made more of the same money

QQQ vs URTH, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
15
where both funds were trading
QQQ won
12
years
URTH won
3
years
YearQQQURTHWinner
2026 (so far)+20.16%+9.81%QQQ
2025+20.77%+21.36%URTH
2024+25.58%+18.66%QQQ
2023+54.86%+23.95%QQQ
2022-32.58%-17.97%URTH
2021+27.42%+22.27%QQQ
2020+48.41%+15.78%QQQ
2019+38.96%+28.15%QQQ
2018-0.13%-8.56%QQQ
2017+32.66%+22.95%QQQ
2016+7.10%+7.31%URTH
2015+9.44%-0.64%QQQ
2014+19.18%+4.37%QQQ
2013+36.63%+26.66%QQQ
2012+18.11%+14.71%QQQ
2011+3.48%
2010+20.14%
2009+54.68%
2008-41.73%
2007+19.03%
2006+7.14%
2005+1.57%
2004+10.54%
2003+49.67%
2002-37.37%
2001-33.34%
2000-36.11%
1999+78.95%

QQQ vs URTH in plain words

QQQ tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index while URTH follows the MSCI World Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. QQQ charges 0.18% a year in running costs and URTH charges 0.24% — QQQ is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 15 calendar years both funds were trading, QQQ finished the year ahead 12 times and URTH 3 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $59,045 in QQQ versus $32,044 in URTH by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

Fund facts: QQQ vs URTH

FactQQQURTH
FundInvesco QQQ TrustiShares MSCI World ETF
TracksNasdaq-100 IndexMSCI World Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.18%0.24%
DividendsDistributing — dividends paid outDistributing — dividends paid out
Launched10 Mar 199910 Jan 2012

Frequently asked

Is QQQ or URTH better?

Across the 15 calendar years both funds were trading, QQQ finished the year ahead 12 times and URTH 3 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $59,045 in QQQ versus $32,044 in URTH by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between QQQ and URTH?

QQQ tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index while URTH follows the MSCI World Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. QQQ charges 0.18% a year in running costs and URTH charges 0.24% — QQQ is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.

What would $10,000 in QQQ have become?

$10,000 invested in QQQ at the start of 2016 grew to $59,045 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 19.4% per year.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring QQQ or URTH.