QQQM vs ACWI: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

QQQM tracks the Nasdaq-100 IndexACWI tracks the MSCI ACWI Index

What did the last 5 years do to $10,000?

You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted. Both funds are measured over the same 5 full years (2021–2025) — the longest stretch both were trading.

QQQM turned it into
$20,250
+15.16% per year on average · 20212025
ACWI turned it into
$17,025
+11.23% per year on average · 20212025
Difference
+$3,224
QQQM made more of the same money

QQQM vs ACWI, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
7
where both funds were trading
QQQM won
4
years
ACWI won
3
years
YearQQQMACWIWinner
2026 (so far)+20.09%+11.66%QQQM
2025+20.85%+22.41%ACWI
2024+25.68%+17.45%QQQM
2023+55.01%+22.27%QQQM
2022-32.52%-18.39%ACWI
2021+27.45%+18.66%QQQM
2020+6.67%+16.34%ACWI
2019+26.59%
2018-9.12%
2017+24.33%
2016+8.40%
2015-2.21%
2014+3.83%
2013+22.38%
2012+16.75%
2011-7.82%
2010+12.78%
2009+32.36%
2008-35.29%

QQQM vs ACWI in plain words

QQQM tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index while ACWI follows the MSCI ACWI Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. QQQM charges 0.15% a year in running costs and ACWI charges 0.32% — QQQM is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 7 calendar years both funds were trading, QQQM finished the year ahead 4 times and ACWI 3 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2021 was worth $20,250 in QQQM versus $17,025 in ACWI by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

Fund facts: QQQM vs ACWI

FactQQQMACWI
FundInvesco NASDAQ 100 ETFiShares MSCI ACWI ETF
TracksNasdaq-100 IndexMSCI ACWI Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.15%0.32%
DividendsDistributing — dividends paid outDistributing — dividends paid out
Launched13 Oct 202026 Mar 2008

Frequently asked

Is QQQM or ACWI better?

Across the 7 calendar years both funds were trading, QQQM finished the year ahead 4 times and ACWI 3 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2021 was worth $20,250 in QQQM versus $17,025 in ACWI by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between QQQM and ACWI?

QQQM tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index while ACWI follows the MSCI ACWI Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. QQQM charges 0.15% a year in running costs and ACWI charges 0.32% — QQQM is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.

What would $10,000 in QQQM have become?

$10,000 invested in QQQM at the start of 2021 grew to $20,250 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 15.2% per year.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring QQQM or ACWI.