QQQM vs ACWI: which ETF won each year?
Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.
QQQMtracks the Nasdaq-100 Index
ACWItracks the MSCI ACWI Index
QQQM tracks the Nasdaq-100 IndexACWI tracks the MSCI ACWI Index
What did the last 5 years do to $10,000?
You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted. Both funds are measured over the same 5 full years (2021–2025) — the longest stretch both were trading.
QQQM vs ACWI, year by year
Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.
| Year | QQQM | ACWI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 (so far) | +20.09% | +11.66% | QQQM |
| 2025 | +20.85% | +22.41% | ACWI |
| 2024 | +25.68% | +17.45% | QQQM |
| 2023 | +55.01% | +22.27% | QQQM |
| 2022 | -32.52% | -18.39% | ACWI |
| 2021 | +27.45% | +18.66% | QQQM |
| 2020 | +6.67% | +16.34% | ACWI |
| 2019 | — | +26.59% | — |
| 2018 | — | -9.12% | — |
| 2017 | — | +24.33% | — |
| 2016 | — | +8.40% | — |
| 2015 | — | -2.21% | — |
| 2014 | — | +3.83% | — |
| 2013 | — | +22.38% | — |
| 2012 | — | +16.75% | — |
| 2011 | — | -7.82% | — |
| 2010 | — | +12.78% | — |
| 2009 | — | +32.36% | — |
| 2008 | — | -35.29% | — |
QQQM vs ACWI in plain words
QQQM tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index while ACWI follows the MSCI ACWI Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. QQQM charges 0.15% a year in running costs and ACWI charges 0.32% — QQQM is the cheaper fund to hold.
Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 7 calendar years both funds were trading, QQQM finished the year ahead 4 times and ACWI 3 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2021 was worth $20,250 in QQQM versus $17,025 in ACWI by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.
Fund facts: QQQM vs ACWI
| Fact | QQQM | ACWI |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | iShares MSCI ACWI ETF |
| Tracks | Nasdaq-100 Index | MSCI ACWI Index |
| Yearly cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.32% |
| Dividends | Distributing — dividends paid out | Distributing — dividends paid out |
| Launched | 13 Oct 2020 | 26 Mar 2008 |
Frequently asked
Is QQQM or ACWI better?
Across the 7 calendar years both funds were trading, QQQM finished the year ahead 4 times and ACWI 3 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2021 was worth $20,250 in QQQM versus $17,025 in ACWI by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.
What is the difference between QQQM and ACWI?
QQQM tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index while ACWI follows the MSCI ACWI Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. QQQM charges 0.15% a year in running costs and ACWI charges 0.32% — QQQM is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.
What would $10,000 in QQQM have become?
$10,000 invested in QQQM at the start of 2021 grew to $20,250 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 15.2% per year.