ACWI vs VTV: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

ACWI tracks the MSCI ACWI IndexVTV tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index

What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?

You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.

ACWI turned it into
$30,708
+11.87% per year on average · 20162025
VTV turned it into
$30,183
+11.68% per year on average · 20162025
Difference
+$526
ACWI made more of the same money

ACWI vs VTV, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
19
where both funds were trading
ACWI won
9
years
VTV won
10
years
YearACWIVTVWinner
2026 (so far)+11.66%+15.30%VTV
2025+22.41%+15.27%ACWI
2024+17.45%+15.95%ACWI
2023+22.27%+9.32%ACWI
2022-18.39%-2.09%VTV
2021+18.66%+26.53%VTV
2020+16.34%+2.33%ACWI
2019+26.59%+25.66%ACWI
2018-9.12%-5.47%VTV
2017+24.33%+17.14%ACWI
2016+8.40%+17.10%VTV
2015-2.21%-0.98%VTV
2014+3.83%+13.17%VTV
2013+22.38%+33.09%VTV
2012+16.75%+15.18%ACWI
2011-7.82%+1.11%VTV
2010+12.78%+14.54%VTV
2009+32.36%+19.88%ACWI
2008-35.29%-35.89%ACWI
2007-0.12%
2006+22.38%
2005+7.21%
2004+13.85%

ACWI vs VTV in plain words

ACWI tracks the MSCI ACWI Index while VTV follows the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. ACWI charges 0.32% a year in running costs and VTV charges 0.03% — VTV is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 19 calendar years both funds were trading, ACWI finished the year ahead 9 times and VTV 10 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $30,708 in ACWI versus $30,183 in VTV by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

Fund facts: ACWI vs VTV

FactACWIVTV
FundiShares MSCI ACWI ETFVanguard Value ETF
TracksMSCI ACWI IndexCRSP US Large Cap Value Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.32%0.03%
DividendsDistributing — dividends paid outDistributing — dividends paid out
Launched26 Mar 200826 Jan 2004

Frequently asked

Is ACWI or VTV better?

Across the 19 calendar years both funds were trading, ACWI finished the year ahead 9 times and VTV 10 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $30,708 in ACWI versus $30,183 in VTV by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between ACWI and VTV?

ACWI tracks the MSCI ACWI Index while VTV follows the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. ACWI charges 0.32% a year in running costs and VTV charges 0.03% — VTV is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.

What would $10,000 in ACWI have become?

$10,000 invested in ACWI at the start of 2016 grew to $30,708 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 11.9% per year.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring ACWI or VTV.